Identification
IDNO
UGA-UBOS-ERT-2011-V1.0
Title
Electricity for Rural Transformation Monitoring Survey 2010, First Round
Subtitle
First Round
Country
| Name | Country code |
|---|---|
| Uganda | UGA |
Abstract
The ERT 1 Monitoring Survey will involve randomly selecting and interviewing households in the selected sites. These respondents will be asked questions about their household characteristics, access to and utilization of grid electricity, alternatives to grid electricity, issues to do with reliability, market availability as well as the perceived cost of the different types of fuel, household appliances, household expenditure on energy and communication among other topics which will be helpful in monitoring the impact of ERT 1.
Household surveys provide valuable information for monitoring government programmes. Monitoring the performance and the outcomes of the ERT I interventions is critical to the evaluation of the progress made and challenges that can be remedied in ERT II.
Household surveys provide valuable information for monitoring government programmes. Monitoring the performance and the outcomes of the ERT I interventions is critical to the evaluation of the progress made and challenges that can be remedied in ERT II.
Kind of Data
Sample survey data [ssd]
Version
Version number
Version 1.0 (edited/final), based on data files and other material provided by Uganda Bureau of statistics on 15th august 2011
Version Date
2010
Version Notes
The ERT dataset is a subset of data obtained from UBOS. It was produced for the ERT MOnitoring survey
Scope
Topic Classification
| Topic | Vocabulary | URI |
|---|---|---|
| EDUCATION [6] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| information technology [16.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| agricultural, forestry and rural industry [2.1] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| TRADE, INDUSTRY AND MARKETS [2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| general health [8.4] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| specific diseases and medical conditions [8.9] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
| social welfare systems/structures [15.2] | CESSDA | http://www.nesstar.org/rdf/common |
Keywords
| Keyword |
|---|
| social welfare systems/structures [15.2] |
| EDUCATION [6] |
| information technology [16.2] |
| agricultural, forestry and rural industry [2.1] |
| TRADE, INDUSTRY AND MARKETS [2] |
| general health [8.4] |
| specific diseases and medical conditions [8.9] |
| social welfare systems/structures [15.2] |
Coverage
Geographic Coverage
Like the Baseline Survey, the ERT 1 Monitoring Survey 2010 aimed at covering three (3) sites that were covered namely Kisiizi, Paidha and Sironko. Both Rural and Urban areas were covered for the survey.
Unit of Analysis
Household, Enterprise , Service Provider, Community
Universe
The Education Institutions, Enterprises, Households, Communities and Health Institutions
Producers and sponsors
Authoring entity/Primary investigators
| Agency Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | Ministry of Finance and Planning |
Producers
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Finance,Planning and Economic Development | Government of Uganda | Participation in data collection and analysis |
Funding Agency/Sponsor
| Name | Abbreviation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| World bank | WB | Funding and technical assistance |
Sampling
Sampling Procedure
The survey was a sample survey. A sample of the population was selected and data collected from them but used to draw conclusions for the entire population. The main reason for using sample surveys instead of a complete enumeration are to reduce the time and cost of collecting information. The accuracy of a sample survey depends among other things, upon the size of the sample. Sample size was predetermined by the survey organizers according to the level of accuracy needed for the results.
The accuracy of a sample survey was also dependent upon another major factor, the absence of bias which would affect the proportions found through the sample. To control or prevent bias from creeping into the results, the selection of households included in the sample was completely random. This means that every person in the total population to be studied has an opportunity to be selected in the sample. This is why it was so important to make callbacks to reach those people who are not at home, since they may be different from people who are at home.
A two stage sampling design was used. At the first stage, a sample of about 30 Enumeration Areas (EAs)/villages has been selected from a sampling frame generated during the pre-visits to the sites. At the second stage, 10 households and 10 establishments was selected using simple random sampling from the selected EAs.
The accuracy of a sample survey was also dependent upon another major factor, the absence of bias which would affect the proportions found through the sample. To control or prevent bias from creeping into the results, the selection of households included in the sample was completely random. This means that every person in the total population to be studied has an opportunity to be selected in the sample. This is why it was so important to make callbacks to reach those people who are not at home, since they may be different from people who are at home.
A two stage sampling design was used. At the first stage, a sample of about 30 Enumeration Areas (EAs)/villages has been selected from a sampling frame generated during the pre-visits to the sites. At the second stage, 10 households and 10 establishments was selected using simple random sampling from the selected EAs.
Deviations from the Sample Design
There was no deviation from sample design.
Data Collection
Dates of Data Collection (YYYY/MM/DD)
| Start date | End date |
|---|---|
| 2010-10 | 2010-11 |
Mode of data collection
Face-to-face [f2f]
Supervision
Each field staff selected to work on the survey worked in teams consisting of one supervisor. Supervisors and Interviewers were either male or female. Each field supervisor was responsible for one team of Interviewers. In the central office, editing officers, data entry staff and computer programmers were also be assigned to the project.
Type of Research Instrument
(i) Household Questionnaire: it contains information about the HOusehold characteristics, individual
(ii) Enterprise Questionnaire
(iii) Service Provider Questionnaires
Education Questionnaire
Health Questionnaire
(v) Community Questionnaire
(ii) Enterprise Questionnaire
(iii) Service Provider Questionnaires
Education Questionnaire
Health Questionnaire
(v) Community Questionnaire
Data Collectors
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance , Planning and Economic Development |
Data Processing
Cleaning Operations
The data were entered in 10 microcomputers using the specially prepared software in CsPro. The data were entered at statistical offices, with 10 staff trained prior to data processing. In order to ensure quality control, the software was programmed to check the internal consistency of data entered. The Stata v.10 statistical package was used for data tabulation and analysis.
Data access
Contact
| Name | Affiliation | URI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Male Mukasa | Uganda Bureau of Statistics | john.malemukasa@ubos.org | http://www.ubos.org |
Confidentiality Declaration
Confidentiality of respondents is guaranteed by Article 19 of The Uganda Bureau of Statistics Act, 1998.
Before being granted access to the dataset, all users have to formally agree:
1. To make no copies of any files or portions of files to which s/he is granted access except those authorized by the data depositor.
2. Not to use any technique in an attempt to learn the identity of any person, establishment, or sampling unit not identified on public use data files.
3. To hold in strictest confidence the identification of any establishment or individual that may be inadvertently revealed in any documents or discussion, or analysis. Such inadvertent identification revealed in her/his analysis will be immediately brought to the attention of the data depositor.
Conditions
The dataset is available as a Public Use Dataset. It is accessible to all for statistical and research purposes only, under the following
terms and conditions:
1.The data and other materials will not be redistributed or sold to other individuals, institutions, or organizations without the written agreement of Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
2.The data will be used for statistical and scientific research purposes only. They will be used solely for reporting of aggregated information, and not for investigation of specific individuals or organizations.
3.No attempt will be made to re-identify respondents, and no use will be made of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently. Any such
discovery would immediately be reported to Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
4. No attempt will be made to produce links among datasets provided by Uganda Bureau of Statistics, or among data from Uganda Bureau of Statistics and other datasets
that could identify individuals or organizations.
5. Any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that employ data obtained from Uganda Bureau of Statistics will cite the source of data in accordance with the Citation Requirement provided with each dataset.
6. An electronic copy of all reports and publications based on the requested data will be sent to Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
7. The original collector of the data, Uganda Bureau of Statistics, and the relevant funding agencies bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
terms and conditions:
1.The data and other materials will not be redistributed or sold to other individuals, institutions, or organizations without the written agreement of Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
2.The data will be used for statistical and scientific research purposes only. They will be used solely for reporting of aggregated information, and not for investigation of specific individuals or organizations.
3.No attempt will be made to re-identify respondents, and no use will be made of the identity of any person or establishment discovered inadvertently. Any such
discovery would immediately be reported to Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
4. No attempt will be made to produce links among datasets provided by Uganda Bureau of Statistics, or among data from Uganda Bureau of Statistics and other datasets
that could identify individuals or organizations.
5. Any books, articles, conference papers, theses, dissertations, reports, or other publications that employ data obtained from Uganda Bureau of Statistics will cite the source of data in accordance with the Citation Requirement provided with each dataset.
6. An electronic copy of all reports and publications based on the requested data will be sent to Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
7. The original collector of the data, Uganda Bureau of Statistics, and the relevant funding agencies bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Citation requirement
"Uganda Bureau of Statistics, Electricity for Rural Transformation Monitoring Survey 2010, Version 1.0 of the public use dataset (August 2011), provided by the Uganda National Data Archive. www.ubos.org/nada"
Disclaimer and copyrights
Disclaimer
The Uganda Bureau of Statistics provide you with the data as is, without any warranty or responsibility implied. UBOS accepts no responsibility for the results and/or implications of any analysis and/or other actions conducted with this data.
Copyright
Uganda Bureau of Statistics, 2010
Contacts
Contact
| Name | Affiliation | URI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Baptist Male Mukasa | Uganda Bureau of Statistics | john-male.mukasa@ubos.org | www.ubos.org |
| Peter Opio | Uganda Bureau of Statistics | peter.opio@ubos.org | www.ubos.org |
| James Muwonge | Uganda Bureau of Statistics | james.muwonge@ubos.org | www.ubos.org |
Metadata production
Document ID
DDI-UGA-UBOS-ERT-2011-V1.0
Producers
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uganda Bureau of Statistics | UBOS | Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning | Documentation of the study |
Date of Production
2011-08-16
Document version
Version 1.0 (August 2011). This documentation is based on the final dataset.